![Rolls of steel](/remote/aHR0cHM6Ly9naWVjZG4uYmxvYi5jb3JlLndpbmRvd3MubmV0L2ZpbGV1cGxvYWRzL2ltYWdlLzIwMjMvMDQvMjYvZHJlYW1zdGltZTEwOTU4MzEycm9sbHMuanBn.9-U4vFqdckc.jpg?w=948&h=533&format=webp&mode=pad&anchor=middlecenter&scale=both&bgcolor=F0F1F2)
© Mircea Bezergheanu | Dreamstime.com
The Global Steel Climate Council (GSCC), a nonprofit organization focused on reducing steel carbon emissions, has released a draft of a global standard to measure and report steel carbon emissions. GSCC’s The Steel Climate Standard focuses on reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the global steel industry.
According to a news release from GSCC, the standard offers a single, technology-agnostic protocol that would apply to all steel producers equally on a global basis and would enable steel customers to know and compare the actual carbon emissions associated with steel products.
Several organizations co-founded GSCC, including Celsa Group, Commercial Metals Co., the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Nucor Corp., Steel Dynamics Inc. and the Steel Manufacturers Association. More than two dozen other organizations from around the world support GSCC and its initiatives.
“Steel companies and associations from around the world have come together to develop a standard that will enable our industry to reduce carbon emissions and encourage investments in lower-emission technology as part of the global effort to decarbonize,” says Greg Murphy, executive vice president at Charlotte, North Carolina-based Nucor Corp. and chair of GSCC.
Nucor President and CEO Leon Topalian adds, “Using a single standard that is ambitious, auditable, inclusive and transparent is needed to accelerate further greenhouse gas emission reductions in our industry and to drive investment in lower-emission technology.”
GSCC reports that it is one of several groups and companies advocating for this type of global standard. According to the GSCC, some groups in the United States and Europe are promoting a standard that features a “ferrous scrap usage sliding scale,” with one standard for steel made from traditional production processes and another for steel made from circular processes. However, Phil Bell, president of the Washington-based Steel Manufacturers Association, says creating a dual standard such as this would allow companies to prioritize high-carbon emissions steel over lower-carbon emissions steel. He says, “This is a form of greenwashing and serves to discourage innovation and allows high-carbon steelmakers to postpone making changes in their production process.”
GSCC says The Steel Climate Standard proposal features two main components, including:
- product certification criteria that allow customers to know if the steel they are buying is on the glidepath to achieve the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement; and
- a corporate-wide, science-based, target-setting framework based on a 1.5-degrees glidepath.
Additionally, GSCC’s standard would measure all GHG emissions pollutants from Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. Producers would have to report independent verification of their emissions and reduction targets. The GSCC standard’s product intensity goals for the steel industry are based on the International Energy Agency’s carbon budget for the iron and steel sector, which is aligned with the 1.5 C scenario for net-zero emissions by 2050.
“Steel is integral to the functioning of global economies, including clean energy infrastructure,” says Jeff Hansen, vice president of environmental sustainability at Fort Wayne, Indiana-based Steel Dynamics Inc. and a GSCC board member. “The Steel Climate Standard is a simple and understandable benchmark for reducing our industry greenhouse gas emissions and provides a transparent means for decision-makers to make informed decisions.”
GSCC is inviting interested organizations to review The Steel Climate Standard and submit comments, which are due May 17.
Latest from Recycling Today
- Hensel Recycling, Mastermelt Ltd. announce collaboration
- Nederman MikroPul’s commitment to clean air solutions
- Nederman MikroPul’s FS Baghouse Technology: The preferred solution for secondary aluminum
- Nederman MikroPul’s FS Dust Collector with Secondary Filtration
- Tomra e-book looks at aluminum sorting tech
- Norske Skog mill conversion project is behind schedule
- Ecovery adds secondary aluminum capacity
- Sibanye-Stillwater Group integrates recently acquired Abington Reldan Metals LLC