Recovered paper is the most important raw material used in paper production in Europe. The tonnage of recovered paper collected for recycling has increased continuously for decades.
In Germany, manual sorting continues to be the most commonly used method. But in order to obtain sufficient and constant quality of the sorted paper fractions, it is essential to organize the sorting processes more efficiently, automate them as far as possible and provide them with suitable quality checks.
Operator Influence |
What influence can the plant operator have on the sorting result? As a matter of principle, the quality of the sorted graphic paper for de-inking (1.11) must not necessarily increase with the level of automation. The obtained product qualities greatly depend on how the plant is operated. For example, with the use of optical systems, a compromise must be found in practice between an efficient separation of unwanted components and an excessively high loss of graphic recovered paper that could be marketed as sorted graphic paper for de-inking (1.11). Just how strictly a plant operator carries out the separation depends also on the market situation. For example, if the profit margin for sorted graphic paper for de-inking (1.11) is small, a “strict” separation of unwanted components is more worthwhile. This is accompanied by a high share of sorted graphic paper for de-inking (1.11) in the separated mixed papers and boards fractions (1.01, 1.02). The produced 1.11 fraction is of a smaller volume but is also purer, so that the cost-intensive manual post-sorting can be reduced. In the opposite case of a high profit margin for sorted graphic paper for de-inking (1.11), the selectivity can be lowered. The loss of 1.11 is minimised and consequently the production of 1.11 maximised. The high profit margin justifies the most cost-intensive manual post-sorting. According to operators, it also occurs that manual post-sorting is completely eliminated due to the market situation. The thus-produced quality does not correspond to the specifications defined in the recovered paper list in relation to the volume of detrimental substances. Despite this, it can be marketed separately from the recovered paper list as “poorer sorted graphic paper for de-inking.” With similar consequences for quality and quantity of the sorted graphic paper for de-inking (1.11), a paper spike or stream sorting can be “run through.” |
This article gives an overview of the status quo of recovered paper sorting in Germany. It shows the parameters that have an important influence on the quality of the recovered paper fractions and demonstrates that the efficiency of these processes can be improved primarily through automation.
GOALS AND STANDARDS. In principle, all non-paper components should be removed as far as possible from the product stream at the time of recovered paper sorting. The criteria for determining the percentage of "unusable materials" for grades defined in the European paper industry’s EN 643 document will be subject to individual mills’ specifications. In the case of a high concentration of unusable materials (e.g., more than 3 percent), customers most often refuse delivery of the recovered paper shipment.
In Germany, it is mainly graphic paper for de-inking that is sorted. Among the detrimental substances that must be removed by sorting to achieve the specified quality are boards, unwanted papers and non-paper materials. In practice, sorting is often done in the form of manual negative sorting, i.e. all detrimental or unwanted components are removed from the material stream.
Besides the sorted graphic paper for de-inking, the recovered paper trade also offers unsorted qualities as well as (sorted) mixed papers and boards. The decisive factor for sorting process profitability is the difference in revenue between the sorted grades, (supermarket corrugated paper and board) and the mixed qualities. As the efficiency of recovered paper sorting depends on market conditions—supply and demand for various recovered paper grades—the volume and quality of the recovered paper is subject to considerable fluctuations.
Paper producers need a high and constant recovered paper quality as well as sufficient volume. These demands lead in part to significantly increased numbers of complaints as well as a greater demand for recovered paper grades with a controlled quality.
AUTOMATION OPPORTUNITIES. Mechanical processing of recyclables in Germany has a history going back more than 30 years. The applied technologies were modeled on processing techniques used in mineral technology and agricultural industries. The introduction of Germany’s Dual System, which was put in place in the early 1990s to meet the goals of packaging recycling legislation, led to technical innovations.
The first steps toward automating recovered paper sorting were undertaken beginning in about 1987. Since then, mechanical sorting techniques have been used to support the manual sorting process. With these mechanical processes, non-de-inkable components, such as OCC, can be separated.
Since about 2002, optical sensors and image processing methods have been used in recovered paper sorting. Despite a large number of different separating combinations used in practice, separation is always realized on the basis of a few stock properties or physical effects. Those properties include size, stiffness, color, composition and weight. The methods use to separate based on those qualities include:
• Screens that classify by weight;
• Conveyor gap techniques;
• Paper spikes;
• Air separators;
• Air stream sorters; and
• Color, CMYK and infrared sensors.
SCREEN TESTS. Screen classification serves especially to accumulate or deplete certain stock groups in the separated stock streams.
The efficiency of a screen depends on the quality of spreading out the material. If material remains layered, many grains cannot pass through the screen, even though their dimensions would allow it otherwise. For example, a large cardboard box at the bottom of a pile of recovered paper may prevent adequately sized material from falling through the screen.
A number of instruments are used in practice to separate large cardboard products. For instance, ballistic separators are screens that support material transport and screening by rotating. The rotating movement can be activated, for example, by driving the screen via an off-center crankshaft.
Disc screens consist of lines of several driven shafts on which discs sit at a defined interval. Depending on the separation task, the size of the discs varies, as does the distance between the shafts. The material is conveyed by the rotation of the shafts fitted with the discs.
Star screens are theoretically comparable to disc screens, but, instead of discs, star-shaped sorting elements are arranged on the rotating shafts.
Drum screens are cylindrical bodies with screen apertures around the circumference. Depending on the purpose for which they are intended, the screen apertures have different sizes and geometries. The defined angle of the screen drums combined with the turning motion conveys the material. Fittings in the screen drum can support the material mixing in an aimed way or slow the throughput. Both the geometry and the size of the screen apertures can vary along the length of a drum body. Drum screens are usually driven via the circumference.
The gap technique does not describe a screen in the conventional sense, despite the fact that separation is achieved by the defined geometry of the separation device. Stock stream is separated by means of adjustable gaps between the conveyors, whose speed and intermediate spaces can be set. The gap can be adjusted horizontally and vertically to achieve different effects.
The above techniques offer the following advantages for separating large-sized cardboard products: proven, reliable technique; minimal downtime because of maintenance; installation is usually possible without major reorganization measures; and insensitivity to non-paper components.
A disadvantage can be that crushed or folded cardboard is not ejected.
COMBINATION PLATTERS. The following processes have shown efficiency in practice as additional possibilities to automate recovered paper sorting:
1. Fine sorting with a "paper spike" or a "de-inking screen" following;
2. Mechanical cardboard product separation with a sensor-assisted cardboard or detrimental substances separation following (additional separation by means of air before detection is possible); and
3. Defined crushing of the stock stream followed by sorting using air flow.
Care must be taken here to ensure that a coarse screen always precedes all three steps.
A fine screen after the coarse screen separates small papers or other components that succeeded in passing through the screen apertures from the paper stream. The fine sorting is usually at about 100 millimeters. This considerably further facilitates a following sorting of the paper stream, as the separation of small elements is highly labor intensive. In principle, the same instruments are used for fine sorting as for coarse sorting, the difference lies in the size of the screen apertures or gap.
Before a "paper spike" or a "de-inking screen" is used, the recovered paper stream should be pre-treated by coarse and fine sorting. Both large and small components should have been extensively removed beforehand. In the "paper spike" or comparable systems, the recovered paper mixture that is to be sorted runs on a conveyor underneath a row of parallel V-belts that are equipped with projecting nails, or "spikes."
The spacing between these V-belts and the conveyor can be adjusted. Stronger materials, such as cardboard and boxboard, are pierced by the spikes arranged in the V-belts. Less-firm materials bend under the pressure of the spikes and are not pierced. After passing the gap, the recovered paper that is not spiked by the nails directly falls on to a removal belt.
Fall in to the Gap |
All screens and the paper spike separate the components of the recovered paper stream into different fractions only on the basis of their size and/or strength. A separation in accordance with other criteria is not possible here. The situation is different with the gap technique, on condition that a vertical adjustment is used to separate the stock stream. After leaving the “ejection belt,” any “heavy” components fly relatively far, whereas “light” components drop to the ground shortly after leaving the belt. It is conceivable, for example, to accumulate catalogues and magazines in this way. If it is assumed that the pulping that precedes the air stream sorting turns the recovered paper stream into a uniform grain size range, then it is the different specific weight of the grains that is responsible for the separating effect in the air stream sorter. Accordingly, with air stream sorting the separation of the recovered paper stream can satisfy other separating criteria that were previously not taken into account. The ash content or combination with coatings/coverings, such as adhesives, influences the weight of a paper scrap. Both criteria have a considerable influence on the following use of the recovered paper for paper production. They can largely determine the efficiency of the process for paper production. Test runs at a paper mill using sorted graphic paper for de-inking (1.11) from an air-stream sorting produced the following insights that should be regarded in relation to the properties of conventional sorted graphic paper for de-inking (1.11) from a different collection area: · At de-inking, the obtained whiteness values were on average approximately four brightness points lower; · A smaller share of magazines resulted in a reduction in the ash content and reduction of strengths; · The losses of the primary and follow-on flotation dropped by about 1.5 percent; · The amount of introduced adhesive was considerably lower; · The share of paper clips was 50 percent lower; · The reject from the high-density cleaner was less fine, the particle size finer; and · The plant ran in an extremely constant way during the test period. Follow-up tests showed that the low magazine share in the air stream screened sorted graphic paper for de-inking (1.11) was largely due to the overall smaller share of magazines in the collection area of the plant. By varying the settings for the automatic recovered paper sorting, such as reducing the throughput per hour, adjusting the air separator and use of a paddle screw for the better separation of magazine bundles, shifts in the recovered paper composition in favour of the magazines in the output can be brought about (9). An improvement in brightness and an increase in the ash content in the recovered pulp are the consequence. The overall reduced losses and reject amounts, the reduction of the adhesives introduced into the process as well as the extremely constant running of the plant, which is especially important for the production of mass printing papers, bring cost advantages for the paper producer. Infrared spectroscopy is used on laboratory scale also to determine the process-relevant measurements and paper contents for the purpose of paper production. It is in fact possible to recognize various additives, fillers and pigments as well as paper strengths with a high degree of precision. Problems with transferring these rules to a recovered paper stream are experienced, among other things, for the following reasons: · The necessary distance of the measuring head to the paper and the resulting, larger measuring area, or difficult focusing respectively; · The different positions and shape of the recovered paper scraps on the belt; · Fluctuations in the dry content and temperature of the recovered paper; · Fluctuations in the surrounding humidity and temperature; and · The high measuring speed due to the fast-running belts. If, in the future, measurement of the named properties is to be possible with a sufficient degree of accuracy on a recovered paper stream, totally different separating criteria than so far could be applied. |
Stronger cardboard and boxboard that is fixed by the spikes is directed to the end of the installation where it is removed from the spikes by a counter-rotating roller and ejected separately from the installation. The "de-inking screen" manufactured by Bulk Handling Systems (BHS), Eugene, Ore., combines the disc sorting technique with a vacuum system. With the aid of a vacuum, the perforated rollers of the screen suck up all recovered paper components, causing flexible components to be separated from boxboard material.
For years, optical recognition units have been used successfully to sort plastics as well as glass. This technique is being used increasingly for recovered paper sorting.
To achieve a successful sort, the recovered paper stream on the feed conveyor must be presented in a single layer. Fine sorting for separating small recovered paper components is also important, as it considerably simplifies the job of the recognition units.
In addition to the sorting technique, an air separator can be positioned before the recognition systems. In the air separator, the material to be separated is directed in its original size by a speed-adjustable acceleration conveyor into the separating space.
OPTICAL OPTIONS. The optical recognition system for sorting graphic paper for de-inking from mixed qualities can consist of the following components:
• High-resolution color camera;
• CMYK sensor; and
• NIR (near-infrared) sensor.
The images recorded with a high-resolution camera are evaluated using image processing and pattern recognition. The most important property here is the color of the detected object. With the aid of a color camera, it is possible to recognize brown and gray boxboard as well as papers that have been dyed throughout. According to the manufacturers, distinguishing between gray newspapers and gray boxboard is a problem. Mistakes can be made also with color. For example, a brown area in a magazine may mistakenly be identified as brown boxboard. It is not possible to distinguish printed boxboard products from color magazines and safely eject them.
The CMYK sensor is able to recognize whether an object was printed with three or four colors. CMYK stands for the colors of cyan, magenta, yellow and black, which are commonly used in color printing. Three-color printing manages without black.
In view of the fact that printing on boxboard does not usually require an extremely high-quality printed image, it is done mostly using the three-color printing process. Whereas the high-resolution color camera can possibly mistake brown boxboard for magazines with brown print, safe detection with a CMYK sensor is considerably more likely, as brown board is seldom printed using the costly four-color process.
Similarly, the recognition of colored papers is possible because they are never printed using the four-color process, whereas identical colors in magazines are printed using the four-color process.
The combination of CMYK sensor and high-resolution camera offers a higher degree of recognition safety because of redundancy. Both systems can recognize color and mutually support one another in the evaluation. Therefore, the combination of these sensors offers a relatively accurate recognition of boxboard and dyed-throughout papers. It also allows the ejection of certain printed boxboard.
NIR sensors detect the adsorption in the infrared wavelength range. They are capable of recognizing the entire spectrum of materials from domestic waste collections (DSD), such as plastics and beverage cartons and sheer layers, which are commonly used on color packaging for frozen food products, when the sensor has been calibrated accordingly. Therefore, a NIR sensor is used in recovered paper sorting to recognize "foreign" materials and their compounds with boxboard.
The advantages of using optical recognition systems for recovered paper sorting are:
• A high level of purity of the de-inked fraction;
• Non-contact recognition of paper and non-paper components;
• Highly accessible technology
• "Extendable" by constant further development of the recognition function;
• Remote maintenance, system monitoring and system service can be carried out in part by the manufacturer via the Internet; and
• Other sorting criteria (ash content, recognition of tacky contaminants, etc.) can be realized.
Drawbacks include:
• The relatively high loss of certain materials;
• The technical complexity makes in-house maintenance possible only to a limited degree;
• Incoming material must be prepared by coarse and fine screening;
• Monolayer coverage is required;
• Recognition only on one side, therefore, with one-sided white packaging paper, there will be 50 percent mistaken categorization;
• Relatively high capital costs;
• High energy and operating costs (power and compressed air); and
• The speed of the conveyor is limited to 2.8 meters per second, as certain paper components "start to fly" at higher conveying speeds.
RISKS AND REWARDS. Besides the screening techniques that have been in use for a relatively long time, other purely mechanical processes are being applied increasingly to separate recovered paper mixtures. Similarly, sensor-assisted separating processes are in increasingly widespread use for sorting.
The level of automation can be raised by combining techniques.
The extent to which cost-intensive technical solutions such as optical systems or air stream sorting will become more widespread depends on several factors. Short contract periods for collecting and sorting recovered paper as well as high prices for non-sorted material make high levels of investment in sorting techniques a risk that people are wary of taking. But if the recovered paper processing industry duly rewards more consistent and better quality, the decision to invest in corresponding automatic sorting techniques will be easier. There is clear potential to optimize separation processes in the dry and in the suspension states.
The authors are with the Darmstadt University of Technology, Paper Technology and Mechanical Process Engineering (PMV), Germany. They appreciate the patience of suppliers and operators of recovered paper sorting systems filling in their inquiries. They acknowledge the financial support of the German Pulp and Paper Association (VDP). INFOR project No. 65R was carried out in cooperation with Dr. A.-M. Strunz of Paper Technology Specialists, Heidenau, Germany.

Explore the November 2006 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Recycling Today
- ReMA board to consider changes to residential dual-, single-stream MRF specifications
- Trump’s ‘liberation day’ results in retaliatory tariffs
- Commentary: Waste, CPG industries must lean into data to make sustainable packaging a reality
- DPI acquires Concept Plastics Co.
- Stadler develops second Republic Services Polymer Center
- Japanese scrap can feed its EAF sector, study finds
- IRG cancels plans for Pennsylvania PRF
- WIH Resource Group celebrates 20th anniversary