Through several years of healthy demand and high prices, recyclers (especially veteran recyclers) were quick to point out that the good times would not last forever. Some even expressed the thought that when the market dropped, it would probably drop steeply.
Trying to time the market’s drop is generally considered a hopeless cause, but in the early part of 2008, some industry analysts and recyclers were willing to speculate that a noticeable drop in demand could tie in to the completion of projects in and around Beijing for the Olympic Games.
Coincidental or otherwise, markets did start softening as China took a pause for the Olympics. But rather than being a seasonal late summer slowdown, demand and pricing for scrap commodities across the board fell sharply in September and October.
By November, the fallout from the market drop included excess inventory throughout much of the supply chain and an outbreak of attempts to renegotiate or break contracts to purchase scrap.
The high-stakes (often long-distance) games of hot potato have resulted in financial pain for brokers and recyclers in particular, though agents for some consumers have stated they do not have the resources to pay for loads of scrap at pre-collapse prices.
TENSION AT THE TABLE Points of view were exchanged but little was settled when scrap traders from China, North America and Europe met at a session hosted by the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association Recycling Branch (CMRA) in Beijing in November. At the CMRA’s "Trade Seminar for Recycling Metal Import & Export under the Global Financial Crisis," representatives from both the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries Inc. (ISRI) and the Bureau of International Recycling (BIR) declared their disappointment and concern about the number of complaints they have received from their member companies about cancelled orders in China. "It’s one thing to renegotiate, we understand that, and quite another to simply walk away," said Bob Garino, a staff member with ISRI (the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries Inc.). "We are concerned about the long-term trade implications. I’d be happy to look for a solution; I’d be happy to hear a solution," he remarked. A Chinese scrap trader at the seminar suggested that many of the cancelled transactions occurred when shippers sent scrap to China through smaller brokers and agents as opposed to working directly with consumers. "Those people who haven’t kept their word are import-export agents," he commented. He also suggested that those sending scrap to China work directly with metal producers. Robert Stein of Alter Trading in the United States, representing the Bureau of International Recycling (BIR), replied, "It doesn’t matter how scrap finds its way; that’s no excuse for the actions that have been taken." Several attendees suggested maintaining a list of disputed transactions and of the companies involved as a way to help avoid the continuation of such practices. Both Garino and Stein said, however, that such a practice would violate the confidentiality that ISRI and BIR promises to its members. Regret was a commonly expressed sentiment. "It’s very unfortunate that, in some cases, the trust that has been built up over the course of a decade has evaporated in one month," said Stein. If the volume of cancelled orders is as widespread as is alleged, said a Chinese delegate, "then much of our effort in the last 20 years has been in vain. In business, credibility is more important than money." The problem is not universal, many delegates also commented, and broad brushes should be avoided. "We have not cancelled one single contract," declared Tony Huang of aluminum producer Shanghai Sigma Metals. "We never renegotiated and we haven’t missed a single payment." His long-term credibility and reliability, said Huang, allows him to pay less on average for scrap. "Credibility is a secret of success." French scrap trader Marc Natan of Manco Consulting suggested more use be made of the BIR’s and ISRI’s arbitration services. Perhaps more knowledge of the arbitration process—as well as of risk management and contract law—could be distributed through printed materials or at events co-hosted by the CMRA in cooperation with the two groups, he suggested. "It’s education," said Natan. "With this bigger market, we have had a lot of new metal companies and traders starting in the last few years, and they don’t always know what kinds of risks they are taking. We need to speak the same language: Not Chinese or English or French, but scrap."
The finger-pointing, hostility, broken relationships and lack of cash flow of late 2008 presents a much different drama from what was taking place throughout the first half of the year.
SILVER SPOON
For recyclers, the New Year’s baby of 2008 could easily have been outfitted with a silver spoon in its mouth.
Pricing calculated by Management Science Associates Inc., Pittsburgh, through its RMDAS (Raw Material Data Aggregation Service) system showed ferrous scrap spot buying averaged $418 per ton for prompt grades and $342 for No. 1 HMS in January.
Similarly, buyers paid more for nonferrous metals, such as copper scrap, in January compared to the last two months of 2007, as the year started out with upward momentum that would carry on into the spring convention season, when recyclers gathered for the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries Inc. (ISRI) Annual Convention & Exhibition in April and the Bureau of International Recycling (BIR) World Recycling Conference in May.
PARTY ATMOSPHERE
The ISRI Annual Convention April 6-10 at the Mandalay Bay resort in Las Vegas attracted record numbers of attendees and exhibitors, as the scrap market enjoyed some of the strongest demand and highest pricing in its history.
In between trading and shopping for equipment, attendees heard presentations that outlined ongoing demand for most secondary commodities.
At the session focusing on ferrous scrap, steel industry analyst Aldo Mazzaferro of Goldman, Sachs & Co., New York, remarked that even with the economic slowdown, "U.S. steelmaking is short of capacity" to serve the domestic market, which is why steelmakers were charging $1,000 per ton for hot-band and $850 per ton for rebar at the time.
American steelmakers were producing at about 90 percent to 92 percent of capacity, so "there’s really not much else to squeeze out of U.S. mills," said Mazzaferro. Additionally, the weak dollar was not attracting imported steel, meaning "essentially there is a bidding war for imported steel."
John Harris, a metals buyer for ArcelorMittal based at one of its Canadian locations, said scrap dealers in the U.S. were benefiting from the weak dollar. "No steel is coming in here, [and] scrap is leaving at a faster rate because it’s a good buy anywhere in the world."
The feeling of prosperity carried forward to the BIR World Recycling Conference in late May in the European resort town of Monte Carlo.
At that event, Recycling Today reported that "a global economy fueled by rapid growth in Asia is continuing to place a strain on the ability of metals producers to satisfy a growing appetite for a variety of metals."
At the time, ferrous scrap was trading for as much as $700 per ton and copper scrap for as much as $3.50 per pound.
As China continued to buy heavily, another one of the world’s fastest-growing markets for scrap, India, was perhaps getting ready to kick into high gear, according to Uijwal Munjal of Rockman Industries and the Hero Group, a family of 20 companies based in India.
Referring to India as being "a few years behind China," Munjal noted that India’s current consumption of metals, such as aluminum and copper, matched where China was at some point in the 1980s or 1990s.
He remarked that the "rapid growth in generation and distribution of electricity in India is the biggest driver of growth for aluminum consumption," though he also pointed to construction, transportation and packaging as helping to fuel India’s 8 percent to 9 percent annual growth in that metal’s consumption.
However, a combination of economic turmoil in the U.S. and severe anti-inflationary measures by China’s government was about to create a sharp turn in markets that completely tipped the supply and demand balance virtually overnight.
SUDDENLY THIS SUMMER
While August pricing for some commodities revealed signs of weakness, for many recyclers the week after the Labor Day holiday served as the signpost that a new demand scenario was in effect.
"Ferrous scrap recyclers received significantly lower bids for their scrap iron and
A PAST VOYAGE When scrap markets were buoyant in the first half of 2008, the primary complaint of recyclers at the time was shipping related, as the recycling industry in the United States was exporting at a level that was straining the shipping network. As scrap export markets ramped up earlier in the decade, recyclers benefited from an abundant availability of shipping containers at a low rate. Those containers would otherwise wait in the United States for a long time to be refilled or even leave the country empty. That circumstance began changing late in 2007. "In general, places like Memphis or Chicago [are] low on containers right now, and carriers are increasing their rates," said Mario Bruendel of the Newport Beach, Calif., office of freight forwarder Fr. Meyer’s Sohn North America, at the 2008 ISRI Annual Convention. Bruendel cited the weak dollar as having caused not only a booming export market, but also a decline in containerized imports.
steel as trading resumed in the post-Labor Day market," Recycling Today reported in October.
Factors cited in the ferrous market during the early part of the price drop were "a continued weakness in overseas demand for America’s ferrous scrap; slower melting schedules at North American steel mills; and a healthy supply of ferrous scrap at processing facilities that allows mills to comparison shop extensively on the spot market."
Far worse than a new pricing paradigm for many recyclers, however, was the flurry of cancelled orders that arose, particularly from China. (See "Tension at the Table" on Page 34.)
Shippers of virtually all commodities—ferrous and nonferrous metal, recovered fiber and plastic scrap—have reported that large numbers of agents, brokers and buyers who placed orders for delivery in October and November have refused to honor their contracts.
Many recyclers have spent significant time in trying to chase down former buyers, renegotiating a purchase price or attempting to reposition containers of scrap so they can be sent to willing buyers.
The economic consequences for many recyclers are still being calculated, but losses in the millions are being reported off the record, and publicly traded companies will soon have to disclose how badly they have been affected.
Sims Metal Management, which has not reported any direct involvement in unpaid shipments, issued comments accompanying its most recent quarterly report that lay the groundwork for less attractive financials to follow.
CEO Daniel Dienst remarks, "For the steel and metal markets, what began as a seasonal slowdown and overstocking environment has now been compounded by a worldwide financial crisis perhaps without precedent in our lifetime. "
INTO THE UNKNOWN
Typically, features such as this one will include the guesses of one or more observers about where the market will head next.
Considering the road that recyclable commodities have traveled in 2008, to offer such a forecast seems about as logical as trying to predict the winner of the 2017 World Series.
What recyclers wish for more than anything is a return to a healthier level of demand for scrap products. Most profess not to be fixated on a return to high prices—they just want assurances that there are homes ready to melt, pulp or otherwise consume the scrap commodities they collect and process.
In his message to Sims Metal Management shareholders, Dienst remarks, "the United States, as the origin of the financial contagion, is certainly not immune from the woes of the global financial crisis and current challenging global business climate. Customers and consumers alike are adjusting their values and levels of raw materials and finished goods inventories against the backdrop of uncertain demand and production prospects."
His comments serve to acknowledge that the current storm is a serious one, and recyclers cannot be certain whether the next wave will lift them up or push them farther away from shore.
The author is editor in chief of Recycling Today and can be contacted at btaylor@gie.net.
Explore the December 2008 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Recycling Today
- Nucor receives West Virginia funding assist
- Ferrous market ends 2024 in familiar rut
- Aqua Metals secures $1.5M loan, reports operational strides
- AF&PA urges veto of NY bill
- Aluminum Association includes recycling among 2025 policy priorities
- AISI applauds waterways spending bill
- Lux Research questions hydrogen’s transportation role
- Sonoco selling thermoformed, flexible packaging business to Toppan for $1.8B