T
he purchase of International Steel Group (ISG), Cleveland, by the Mittal Steel Co. is only the most recent acquisition to sweep the world steel industry. Steel mills have been charging into themerger and acquisition mentality in the last two years. Giving rise to such transactions was one of the U.S. government’s primary intentions when it put Section 201 tariffs in place for steel products.
The sweep of mergers has helped the steel industry restructure into a much healthier business. This, scrap metal recyclers and steel mills say, is a positive step. In fact, several scrap recyclers say they prefer working with a handful of large, healthy steel companies, rather than with many financially ailing companies.
However, the trend toward fewer steel companies does pose some potential concerns about scrap purchasing. With fewer buyers in the market, some question whether there is a tipping point where healthier steel companies will attempt to strong-arm suppliers for the most favorable rates.
Despite the number of worldwide mergers among mini-mills and integrated steel makers, a fair number of steel companies remain.
NEW EAF MILL STARTS, STOPS |
A new destination for ferrous scrap is now in place. The first melt at an electric arc furnace (EAF) steel mill built by Wheelinig-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. in Mingo Junction, Ohio, took place in late November. Unfortunately, an accident at the plant two weeks after start-up temporarily halted production. Ductwork and equipment fell from the roof of the facility Dec. 9, injuring two workers. At the EAF mill’s opening ceremony, company leaders expressed confidence in the mill’s ability to strengthen Wheeling-Pitt. "We accomplished something that will have a positive impact on the Upper Ohio Valley for many years to come," said James Bradley, Wheeling-Pittsburgh chairman, president and CEO. The plant’s Consteel EAF is a continuous steelmaking furnace that has been integrated into Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel’s traditional blast furnace hot end, a unique configuration in the United States. The mill’s features include a continuous scrap feed conveyor; a preheating process that heats the scrap steel used to charge the furnace to 1,000 degrees; and the ability use either 100 percent scrap or a mix of scrap and liquid iron. |
While scrap industry watchers differ as to whether a potential scrap shortage in the near future, with higher ferrous scrap prices, more EAF and integrated steel mills are renewing their interest in using scrap substitutes.
This step could lessen the reliance of steel mills on the more volatile scrap market.
SCRAP ALTERNATIVES.Charles Bradford, a consultant to the steel industry, says that a number of steel companies in North America are looking at augmenting their raw material sources by purchasing or developing hot briquetted iron or direct-reduced iron (DRI).
While DRI fell out of favor among steelmakers several years ago because of high natural gas costs, prices for natural gas have since eased. This may make DRI a more marketable product for the time being. In addition to DRI, other scrap substitutes also could become sought-after commodities.
A significant rise in ferrous scrap prices may, on the surface, cause concern for scrap purchasing officials. However, Bradford is quick to point out that higher ferrous scrap prices typically benefit the steel industry. "They always complain about rising scrap prices," he says. "However, when scrap prices go up, the steel industry does better."
As scrap prices have escalated, steel companies have been able to push through higher finished steel prices, helping to improve the financial health of the domestic steel industry.
Although higher scrap prices do not necessarily harm the steel industry, Bradford does point out that steel companies are always searching for ways to blend in greater amounts of scrap substitutes. This strategy relates in part to the challenge of continuing to obtain high-grade scrap to make higher grades of finished steel.
While switching between scrap and scrap substitutes is a way to keep scrap prices in check to a degree, some steel consumers are also looking to soften the spikes in ferrous prices by negotiating away from spot markets and focusing on establishing a barter system using the scrap generated at their plants.
SHIP SHAPE |
Steel is the main reason activity at Indiana port facilities was up in 2004, according to the Indiana Port Commission. Tonnage at the Lake Michigan Port of Indiana-Burns Harbor was up 29 percent through October of 2004, with steel providing the biggest boost. Through 10 months, the port handled 731,645 tons of steel, up 53 percent over the 2003 level. Indiana’s river ports also showed an increase in steel traffic. Overall, steel tonnage shipped from Indiana’s public port system inclreased 64 percent in the first 10 months of 2004. On the Ohio River, shipments of steel from the Port of Indiana-Mount Vernon were up 82 percent through October, exceeding the combined total of every other year in port history for the second consecutive year. Located near Louisville, Ky., the Port of Indiana-Jeffersonville also experienced tremendous steel increases, up 95 percent through October of 2004 versus the first 10 months of 2003. |
THE BARTER SYSTEM.
Greg Maindonald, vice president of operations services for IPSCO Steel, a Lisle, Ill.-based steel company, says that some steel consumers are looking to get away from industrial scrap auctions, instead opting to trade their industrial scrap for more favorable prices on finished steel. IPSCO also operates a number of scrap processing facilities that are used to feed the company’s mini-mills.Maindonald says that auto manufacturers such as Ford Motor Co. have taken steps to offer their industrial scrap back to steel mills. In return, the steel mills will keep prices more stable.
However, he stresses that these steps are limited. Part of the reason is that while a move to barter scrap shipments for more favorable finished steel prices is helpful in the short term, logistical issues take time and effort to sort out in the longer term.
"This is a very regional and fractional business; very relationship based," Maindonald adds.
While some of the larger steel companies are finding it an opportune time to flex their purchasing muscles, many of the largest integrated steel companies that have been merging are not the largest consumers of scrap metal, as their manufacturing processes consume 25 percent scrap on average. This has led to some uncertainty on their part. Maindonald says these integrated steel mills have to be very careful about what they are doing so as not to create larger problems.
TUBE CITY MERGES WITH IMS |
The investment group that owns International Mill Service (IMS), of Horsham, Pa., has negotiated an agreement to merge Tube City Holdings LLC into a newly-combined mill services company. Current managers of both IMS and Tube City also own shares in the combined company. The ownership of the combined company, known as Mill Services Corp., consists of New York-based private equity group Wellspring Capital Management LLC and current managers of each mill service company. The transaction is scheduled to close after required approvals have been obtained and other customary closing conditions have been satisfied. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. Mill Services Corp. is the holding company formed by Wellspring when it acquired International Mill Service in the first half of 2004. Michael Coslov, Tube City’s CEO, will serve as the new company’s CEO. International Mill Service President & CEO Ray Kalouche will serve as president and COO of the International Mill Service/Olympic Mill Services division. Joseph Curtin, formerly president of Tube City, will serve as president and COO of the Tube City division. "We are excited to have this opportunity to combine these two great companies. We think the opportunities for our customers and our employees are tremendous," says Coslov. A press release touts the new firm as a "provider of specialty services to the global steel industry." |
Chip Hering, executive vice president of Ferrous Processing & Trading, a scrap recycler headquartered in Detroit, says that at the present time there really isn’t much of a change in the purchasing dynamic for the steel industry. "Scrap is so tight right now, I just don’t see it."
He adds that while ferrous scrap prices have strengthened, steel pricing also has gone through the roof.
With the market the way it is right now, Hering says it is really too difficult to determine whether steel mills are shifting their approaches to purchasing. "There are too many variables in the market right now," he says.
While acknowledging that consolidation should give the mills some pricing power, "I would say I prefer a strong, consolidated steel industry." The alternative, he points out, would be a host of struggling steel mills with some serious uncertainties about financial health.
Hering says that while some larger consumers will move to work out some form of bartering agreement, this will likely only work temporarily. He surmises that so many logistical questions are involved in coordinating the process that it almost makes it too difficult to conduct for an extensive period of time.
ISRI, SMA WORK TO COOPERATE |
While the often contentious relationship between suppliers and consumers in the recycling industry has carried through boom and bust cycles, some members of both groups feel that a more cooperative approach would be mutually beneficial to both industries. To prove this is more than mere words, a group of members from the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA) and the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries (ISRI) met last year to improve their dialog and to work together in a more cooperative manner. In the initial meeting, Joel Denbo, ISRI’s chair, and Keith Busse, chair of the SMA, called for an improved level of trust, understanding and interaction between the two groups. The initial goal of the meeting was to find ways the two groups could work together, and they did earmark several areas of top importance, including: • Scrap Pricing Data Quality—Discussion at the meeting focused on ways • Transportation—This area included shortages of equipment that were • Environmental Issues—Mercury, PCBs and radiation detection are some • Product Quality—The issue of scrap specifications were addressed, and • Global Trade Issues—The two groups agreed to jointly oppose global The select members from both associations are slated to meet in February during the SMA board of directors meeting. In addition to representatives from the staffs of ISRI and SMA, participants in the meeting included top officials from Steel Dynamics Inc., Gerdau Ameristeel Corp., Gallatin Steel, Tennessee Valley Recycling, Nucor Corp., Alter Trading Corp., CMC Steel Group, Padnos Iron and Metal, Metal Management Inc. and Davis Industries Inc. |
Obsolete scrap will probably continue to be sold more on a month-to-month basis, despite some large consumers of steel having a greater interest in developing something of a bartering approach to lessen the volatility of the price spikes for steel.
STRIVING FOR TRANSPARENCY.
While changes in purchasing demands have been limited, there has been some interest in alternatives to the traditional method of buying and selling scrap metal. One area that has gained some converts has been a reporting method by Management Science Associates, Pittsburgh. This group has taken steps to provide more transparency to the pricing industry though its Raw Material Data Aggregation Service, which it hopes will allow steel mills to get a better feel for prices for the different grades of scrap.Concerns about pricing transparency are often mentioned by scrap consumers. With an approach to purchasing that consists mostly of monthly auctions, it is becoming increasingly more difficult for scrap consumers to attempt to determine a fair market price.
While still a fairly new service, Management Science Associates claims that a fairly significant number of metals clients are using the Raw Material Data Aggregation Service.
Pricing issues are a point of contention for many scrap dealers and mill officials. While skirting any outright accusations, representatives from both sides say that pricing uncertainty is one of their biggest concerns.
While ferrous scrap prices are up significantly right now, many processors are quick to point out that finished steel prices also are up sharply.
What sets some processors on edge is the notion that while some consumers complain that processors are overcharging in an up market, there isn’t the same outcry when markets are on the downside and steel mills cut prices or orders to take advantage of softer prices.
While this philosophy does exist on both sides, several processors say there does seem to be an improved air of cooperation. Hering, for one, says that there definitely is a spirit of cooperation on both sides. This may just be an aberration because of stronger pricing, but Hering is glad to see it at the present time.
Another supplier says that because of the nature of the scrap industry, "We have to be immediately responsive. We buy scrap every month. If we are not consistent with the market, it would be very tough to make any long-term commitment."
In acknowledging the fact that steel mills and suppliers often talk to each other, but don’t always listen, members of the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries Inc. (ISRI) and the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA) have been meeting to discuss ways in which both sides can come to a better understanding of how the other side of the equation operates. The associations issued a joint statement in December that listed points of agreement reached through the dialaog.
Whether steel mill buyers have a stronger position in light of today’s market realities, Robin Wiener, executive director of ISRI, says improving the relationship between scrap consumers and scrap dealers is becoming more likely. She says ISRI met with SMA to find common ground between the two groups. "We have gotten together to improve the interaction between the groups," Wiener says.
Whether this commitment to a better working relationship will help smooth some of the volatility in the market has yet to be determined. However, the set pieces to a new stage appear to be in place.
The author is senior and Internet editor of Recycling Today and can be reached at dsandoval@gie.net.
Explore the January 2005 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Recycling Today
- ReElement, Posco partner to develop rare earth, magnet supply chain
- Comau to take part in EU’s Reinforce project
- Sustainable packaging: How do we get there?
- ReMA accepts Lifetime Achievement nominations
- ExxonMobil will add to chemical recycling capacity
- ESAB unveils new cutting torch models
- Celsa UK assets sold to Czech investment fund
- EPA releases ‘National Strategy to Prevent Plastic Pollution’