Pardon Our Dust

At first glance, it may be difficult to imagine how a catastrophe in the food and beverage industry could cause far-reaching effects for managers of document destruction facilities. However, in February 2008, that unlikely scenario came to fruition when a fire erupted at an Imperial Sugar factory.

On Feb. 7, 2008, an explosion and fire at an Imperial Sugar plant in Port Wentworth, Ga., killed 14 workers and injured several more. News reports indicated that the explosion was caused by the accumulation of massive amounts of sugar dust within the facility.

As a result of the deadly fire, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) revised and reissued its Combustible Dust National Emphasis Program (CDNEP). OSHA enacted the original CDNEP in October 2007, but after the Imperial Sugar plant fire, the regulatory agency reissued the CDNEP in March 2008. Among the most significant changes to the program were increased inspections and enforcement.

"OSHA revised the Combustible Dust NEP to focus on industries with more frequent and high-consequence dust incidents, and to include more inspections," an OSHA spokesman says. The revised CDNEP calls for 300 inspections per year, up from the 80 inspections per year in the original program. Within the executive summary of the revised CDNEP, the paper products and recycling industries are specifically mentioned among the various industries that are expected to comply with the CDNEP.

According to an OSHA spokesman, the agency "has found more than 4,900 violations at the facilities inspected pursuant to the Combustible Dust NEP," which includes dust-related violations as well as others. He adds that the average number of violations per NEP inspection is 6.5 in federal enforcement compared to 3.1 for other types of inspection.

Although there are costs to upgrading dust collection equipment, doing so now may ultimately save a company money in the long run, especially with increased enforcement of regulations, according to Jeremiah Wann, president of Jackson Center, Pa.-based dust collection equipment manufacturer Imperial Systems Inc.

"There has been a huge push by OSHA to force companies handling combustible dust to clean up their operations," says Wann. "We have seen many companies get fines, some in excess of $750,000, due to poor housekeeping. Once OSHA gets involved, they might require you to install a system that is very expensive and that would not have had to been installed if the [original] system was properly designed in the first place."

Managers of document destruction companies would be wise to consider several factors before installing a dust collection system at their facilities, including shredding equipment selection, facility layout and method of conveyance.

"Shredding technology is the first step in understanding dust control," says Dave Wilson, manager of document/product destruction for SSI Shredding Systems, Wilsonville, Ore. "Each type produces varying degrees of dust, consequently the type of shredding technology is the first thing to evaluate and understand."

According to Wilson, in general, the slower the speed of the cutting technology, the less dust it will produce. "A 20-rpm shredder will produce less dust than a 100-rpm shredder, and the most dust produced will be a hammer-mill type shredder."

Additionally, when using a rotary grinder, document destruction companies should be sure to rotate the teeth regularly and to keep them sharp to reduce the amount dust generated, says Gregg Puhl, president and owner of G.F. Puhl, a dust control supplier based in Gallatin, Tenn. Puhl also advises using the maximum screen size available when possible, which will decrease the need to re-shred documents and ultimately will reduce the amount of dust generated.

Beyond shredding equipment selection, a facility’s layout and location can have a significant impact on setting up a dust collection system. "Make sure that you have enough room to install your dust collector inside or outside," says Wann. "We usually install any system over 5,000 CFM (cubic feet per minute) outside. Some industrial parks will not let you install equipment outside."

Within a document shredding facility, it is vital to consider the amount of available floor space as well as ceiling heights and the location of support columns, according to Steve Idalski, sales manager for Alpena, Mich.-based Ameri-Shred. Idalski also advises being sure that the electrical requirements of the dust control system do not exceed a facility’s voltage capacity.

Other planning considerations may seem obvious, but must not be overlooked. "Consider air flow patterns in the facility when you are determining placement of shredding systems," advises Mike Carver, co-owner of SC Environmental, a Mequon, Wis.-based partner company of Cresswood Shredding Machinery that engineers and installs recycling equipment. "Keep equipment away from dock doors, for instance, where wind gusts may wreak havoc on dust control patterns."

Several equipment vendors indicate that material transfer points are prime areas for dust generation. Therefore, Shred-Tech’s Mike Davison advises placing pickups at all transfer points. "Pickups should be located at each material drop point: from conveyor to shredder, conveyor to conveyor, conveyor to baler hopper and baler stroke exhaust," says Davison, applications manager for the Cambridge, Ontario, Canada-based shredding equipment manufacturer.

In addition, two predominant styles are available for containing dust after the shredded material exits the shredder and is transferred to the baler. "Conveyors can be equipped with top and bottom covers to contain dust," says Jeff Dietterich, president of Advanced Equipment Sales, a shredding system and dust control equipment provider based in Franconia, Pa. "Using air conveyance to transfer paper from the shredder to the baler instead of conveyor belts eliminates transfer points and keeps dust contained," he offers as an alternative.

While using conveyors to transfer material may have short-term cost benefits, Puhl says air conveyance can be more effective at controlling dust. "Air evacuation is an excellent method to convey the shredded material as well as to move the dust to a filter," he says. "Conveyor evacuation of a shredder is less costly up front in many cases but does not address the dust generated in the shredding process."

Once a shredding operation has determined it needs to install or expand upon a dust collection system, selecting an equipment vendor that is aware of the various regulations affecting the document destruction industry is vital.

"Ask about the vendor’s familiarity with prevailing state, federal and local regulations as well as current applicable National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) standards," says Dietterich. "NFPA standards will be the primary point of reference for all above referenced regulatory agencies, insurance underwriters and other authorities having jurisdiction."

Davison adds that document destruction companies should request that the supplier aid them in attaining the necessary regulatory approvals for the system.

In addition, shredding companies should provide equipment suppliers with detailed floor plans of their sites, information about the shredding method used and the speed of the equipment. "The faster the FPM (feet per minute), the greater risk of a spark, fire or explosion," Davison says. "This may affect the type of dust collector needed; explosion proof or not explosion proof."

Related to explosion protection, Wann says it is necessary for document destruction firms to have their dust tested to determine its Kst value (a measurement of dust’s deflagration index or explosive power). "We will need to know the Kst values in order to determine if explosion vents are required and how many," says Wann, noting that the NFPA 68 Standard on Explosive Protection by Deflagration Venting requires deflagration venting depending upon the Kst value.

Finally, for facilities handling the destruction of electronic media or hard drives there are more precautionary factors to consider when adding a dust collection system.

"When shredding electronics, hard drives and some products sparks can be created. If the spark reaches the dust collector, it could ignite a fire or cause an explosion," Dietterich says. "The dust generated from shredding these items has different explosive characteristics than paper dust as measured by the Kst factor of the dust."

He adds, "Metal dusts are generally far more explosive than paper dusts and therefore affect the required area of the dust collector explosion relief venting. The conveyance ducting should be equipped with a flame and spark detection and extinguishing system that will detect and extinguish the flame or spark while moving through the ductwork prior to entering the dust collector."

Even facilities that are not currently shredding hard drives or other electronic devices may want to consider including such equipment or at least installing a system that can be retrofitted to include the necessary equipment, should the facility grow and begin handling these materials.

According to Carver, the fundamental question to ask prior to purchasing a dust collection system is, "What are my current shredding requirements and what is my five- to 10-year growth plan for my plant-based destruction business?"

Answering that question may help document destruction firms to comply with current regulatory requirements in addition to enabling them to expand their operations as their business grows. n

The author is assistant editor of Storage and Destruction Business and can be contacted at zlloyd@gie.net.