The situation now can be summed up as follows:
•Impacts of past inaction are being felt
•There is a more concerned/aware public
•Waste generation is rising fast; organic content of municipal solid waste (MSW) is dropping (so less likely to degrade when left unattended)
•Landfills are filling up; Not-in-My-Back-Yard (NIMBY) syndrome blocks new ones
•Incineration is not considered a viable option by most.
Taken together, this means that most waste managers and policymakers concerned about waste have had to begin to think seriously about concepts such as waste reduction, waste minimization and, of course, recycling.
A manifestation of the new concern about waste management is the level of legislative and regulatory activity underway in Latin American nations. Five nations already have national MSW laws or regulations, six have bills pending and six are preparing laws or regulations.
Some of these projects have important longer-term implications for packaging and recycling. Peru’s new Solid Waste Law, for example, imposes packaging take-back obligations. There likely will be more moves to adopt or update comprehensive national legislation on waste management.
The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and World Bank (IBRD) are all preparing, or helping prepare, national diagnoses of the waste sector. These inevitably recommend adopting a comprehensive national law or regulation, and often suggest that these codes also include provisions on waste minimization and/or recycling.
Growing Interest in Recycling
Although organized post-consumer recycling appeared in Latin America as early as 1977 (in Rio de Janeiro), it did not start in earnest until the mid-to-late 1980s in Brazil and Colombia and the 1990s in Chile and Venezuela. Now, however, the region is catching the fever.
Aggressively leading the way is Brazil. Brazilian federal authorities have developed a National Waste Policy that enshrines the producer responsibility principle and envisions the adoption of legally binding instruments on take-back of items as diverse as household toxics to wastes from electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Such binding federal take-back rules have already been adopted for batteries and tires, with packaging next on the list.
Brazil’s feds also have sketched out an ambitious “Industrial Policy on Recycling” that would make it the region’s leader in the area. The Federal Congress is also trying to get into the act, working on an omnibus waste bill that would impose recycling rules on batteries, tires, WEEE, packaging, fluorescent lamps, end-of-life vehicles and more. Brazilian state authorities meanwhile are drafting their own comprehensive state waste policies with take-back provisions. Rio de Janeiro state has adopted a plastic packaging take-back law, and several states have adopted battery take-back laws.
In some other Latin American nations this movement may pick up speed at the prodding of PAHO and IDB. The former sees recycling as a way to reduce waste for final disposal and to cover costs. IDB is making its urban environment loans conditional on serious consideration of starting a recycling program.
However, in many Latin American nations, particularly the poorer ones, recycling may take quite some time to take root. Some of the inhibiting factors are: availability of financing/investment; demands of more pressing sanitation problems (cleaning streets; new landfills; closing dumps; improving garbage pick-up); low environmental awareness/education; limited technical/manpower resources; legal and economic disincentives; institutional deficiencies; no political push from above.
The Spread of Recycling in Latin America |
Argentina: 50+ cities with recycling programs; Buenos Aires province adopted buy-recycled public purchasing law; SDSyPA (national agency of sustainable development) preparing national recovery plan; waste bill includes recycling targets. Brazil: Adopting national take-back regulations; developed industrial policy for recycling; 135 cities with selective collection programs. Chile: Recycling program in Santiago, national environmental fund promoting in other cities; national recycling plan under development. Colombia: Renewed interest in zero waste covenants, decree mandating municipal recycling. El Salvador: Studying deposits for auto batteries, paper, plastics, packaging. Mexico: Deposit schemes considered for batteries, tires and lubricants; interest in packaging targets remains. Peru: Waste law features take-back; CONAM, Peru’s environment ministry, promoting national paper recycling drive. Venezuela: 199 public drop-off centers; recyclability marking initiative launched; steady growth in number of municipal programs started. Regional: Recyclability coding spreading; IDB pushing recycling in borrowing nations; four national pro-recycling industry groups have formed a federation, while groups form in two more; Re-Caribe waste reduction and recycling alliance launched. |
Targets
It is difficult to make sweeping generalizations about which products and sectors are targeted by Latin American nations, as their concerns vary. A more useful approach is to consider two different sets of targets: a “first tier,” composed of seven items, where action is well underway in several key nations and likely will be in others in the near future: and a “second tier” of targets where concern is percolating in many nations and trial balloons are released, but they have not yet reached critical mass.
“First Tier.” The top sectors currently already under fire are batteries, tires, plastics, packaging in general, fluorescent lamps, used oil and pesticide packaging.
•Batteries. Brazil has adopted a national take-back regulation, Argentina is pondering take-back schemes, Mexico has pledged to ban mercury in batteries, El Salvador is interested in a deposit/return system, PAHO’s Latin American Network for the Environmental Management of Wastes (REPAMAR) is working on a unified approach among eight nations.
•Tires. Brazil has adopted a national take-back regulation, Mexico has pondered a deposit/return system, while many nations examine whether to direct scrap tires to be used in energy recovery.
•Plastics. Brazil’s Rio de Janeiro state has adopted a plastic packaging take-back law, and national authorities are debating a similar measure. Jamaica plans a national policy on plastic packaging material (PPM). Uruguay has a plastic packaging-recycling covenant. Anti-plastic packaging legislation is cropping up in Argentina and Costa Rica.
•Packaging in general. Peru has imposed take-back on packaging in its new Solid Waste Law. Brazil’s National Environment Council (CONAMA) is currently drafting a national take-back regulation, while Congress contemplates its own measures. A Euro-style packaging waste bill has been proposed in Mexico and similar bills are expected soon in Argentina and Chile.
•Fluorescent lamps. Brazil is preparing a national take-back regulation. Mexico has pledged an initiative on lamps; legislation has been introduced in Argentina. Colombia and Chile have contemplated regulatory measures.
•Used oil. REPAMAR has launched a regional project on the subject. Several Brazilian states are contemplating recycling legislation.
•Pesticide packaging. Brazil and Peru have new legislation imposing take-back of pesticide packaging, while Colombia and Mexico have concluded covenants with industry on the subject. REPAMAR has launched a regional project on the subject. Many Latin American nations view this as a significant problem.
“Second Tier.” There is rising interest among Latin American nations in tackling construction/demolition wastes and household toxics. Some countries are also becoming interested in action on expired medicines and their packaging. Two areas where Brazil is prepared to act but does not yet appear to be on others’ agendas are WEEE and end-of-life vehicles (ELVs).
•Construction/demolition wastes. Most South and Central American nations are interested in this issue because it is a widespread problem. However, so far only Colombia has adopted a regulation on the topic, although Brazil appears poised to do so.
•WEEE. Brazil plans a national take-back regulation on this topic, while bills tackling it have been introduced in federal and state legislatures.
•ELVs. There is general agreement in Brazil on the desirability of ELV recycling, but disagreement on the details for doing it. Bills are pending at the federal and state levels.
This is the introduction to Keith Ripley’s report Recycling & Solid Waste in Latin America: Trends and Policy, available from Raymond Communications Inc., College Park, Md., www.raymond.com .
Explore the September 2001 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Recycling Today
- Alumetal of Poland issues EPD
- Bolder Industries receives grant for European project
- Regenx says US facility back online
- Cliffs has money-losing Q3
- BIR Autumn 2024: Supply challenges poised to grow
- Befesa reports double-digit adjusted EBITDA growth in Q3
- Companies partner to standardize build of chemical recycling plants
- Solarcycle to add recycling plant to Georgia campus