King County, Wash., actively promotes the virtues of C&D recycling, starting with re-use.
King County is the urban center of the state of Washington, with 1.7 million of the state’s approximately 5.8 million people. Large, international corporations like Microsoft and Starbucks, and high-tech companies such as Amazon.com have contributed to the county’s thriving economy. King County (with Seattle as its largest city) experienced a 10 percent population increase in the past decade, and an unprecedented building boom.
As a regional government, King County manages the solid waste system. Private companies collect the waste, which King County transfers and discards. Construction, demolition and land-clearing (CDL, or C&D) waste makes up 20 to 30 percent of the overall waste stream. The county received 187,800 tons of construction waste in 1998, and 209,400 tons in 1999. Most of the construction waste goes to privately operated landfills rather than to the landfill owned and operated by King County.
While the estimated recycling rate for construction debris is 30 to 40 percent, the salvage
and reuse rate for building materials is harder to target. There are strong markets for salvaged concrete, asphalt, brick and rock, and lumber and timber; residential architectural features such as staircases and moldings have always enjoyed high demand. Several private concerns handle these markets: Three large specialized retail stores accept materials from commercial contractors and the general public, and several demolition contractors operate retail re-sale yards for salvaged materials.
Case by Case King County’s CDL Case Studies collection offers several recycling project summaries. |
Baugh Construction - Boeing Commercial Airplane Group Headquarters, Renton, Wash. • 94% Recycling Rate • 6,590 tons recycled Earthwise, Inc. (Mercer Island, Wash., Residence Salvage) • $38,443 Cost Savings • 60% Recycling Rate • 373 tons recycled Lozier Homes Klahanie Development, Issaquah, Wash.• $14,736 Cost Savings • 55% Recycling Rate • 132.7 tons recycled
Sellen Construction: Microsoft Pebble Beach, Redmond, Wash. • $186,000 Cost Savings • 74% Recycling Rate • 2,310 tons recycled Microsoft Office Remodel, Redmond, Wash. • $38,443 Cost Savings • 60% Recycling Rate • 373 tons recycled Lease Crutcher Lewis - Kentlake High School, Kent, Wash.• $16,500 Cost Savings • 60% Recycling Rate • 664 tons recycled; 1,689 tons reused RAFN Company - RAFN Corporate Office Remodel
• $6,500 Cost Savings • 42% Recycling Rate • 24 tons recycled/salvaged Hensel Phelps - King County Regional Justice Center, Kent, Wash. • $242,630 Cost Savings • 61% Recycling Rate • 2,730 tons recycled Howard S. Wright - Microsoft Data Center, Redmond, Wash. • $6,200 Cost Savings/ $195,100 combined demolition and construction phase cost savings • 54% Recycling Rate/93% Recycling Rate combined for demolition and construction phases • 1,260 tons recycled. |
STARTING A PROGRAM
Before 1993, two private construction waste landfills handled most commercially generated C&D debris. County facilities weren’t equipped to process the sheer tonnage of the commercial waste, but accepted smaller amounts from remodeling homeowners. When the private construction landfills closed in 1993, King County contracted two regional garbage companies to collect construction waste at transfer stations and then transport the waste to private landfills outside the county.
With the new construction waste plan in place, and facing unprecedented building activity, in 1993 King County began educating the building industry about recycling and reusing building materials. The program has since grown from one part-time employee offering limited technical assistance to a full technical assistance and recognition program with two full-time employees.
It is important to note that the region has a strong private-sector infrastructure for recycling construction materials. Private C&D companies collect and process virtually all construction recyclables. The most economical to handle are: clean wood, some painted and treated wood and laminates, brush from land clearing, metals (ferrous and non-ferrous), gypsum drywall, asphalt roofing (non-asbestos 3-tab and built-up roofing) and concrete/asphalt/rock and brick. Recycling costs for other materials (carpet, acoustical ceiling tile) are increasingly competitive with disposal rates. One way King County promotes private recyclers can be found on the Web with the "Seattle/King County Construction Recycling Directory": http://dnr.metrokc.gov/swd/bizprog/sus_build/CDLguide.pdf (the directory is also available in hard copy).
SUCCESS IS IN THE NUMBERS
Early planning and a committed crew can yield an 80 percent to 90 percent job site recycling rate and significant cost savings. The C&D program identifies upcoming projects that will generate substantial waste, contacting developers, and working with the project team to develop a waste management plan. The county also responds to public inquiries about construction site recycling by phone and e-mail, and provides the public with a searchable recycling database.
The county’s early involvement has helped spur several high-profile C&D recycling efforts, including some attached to construction projects on the Microsoft campus that have resulted in more than 2,500 tons of C&D material being recycled there, and a Boeing project that saw more than 6,500 tons of material recycled.
Technical information about recycling is combined with extensive education and outreach to the construction industry. In northwest Washington, the success of construction recycling hinges on two factors: Recycling must remain voluntary rather than mandatory; and the marketplace must determine the economic viability of recycling without direct subsidies from King County government.
Since King County provides no subsidies, and delegates collection and manufacturing services to private vendors, CDL program staff members focus on creating incentives for construction companies to recycle their waste and to build with salvaged and recycled-content materials.
Fortunately, job site recycling in the region makes clear economic sense. The cost to dump construction materials averages $85.00/ton, whereas recycling costs anywhere from free to $55/ton—a real incentive to recycle.
ECONOMICS 101
In developing the program, commercial and residential construction was researched, and it was decided to target large, commercial job sites. Their economy of scale meant substantial resource recycling (wood, gypsum drywall, metals, cardboard and concrete) and financial savings more visible than in smaller, residential projects. However, only a few prominent companies capitalized on these benefits through extensive recycling. To spread the word, we produced case studies quantifying the savings active recyclers had achieved. Highlighting these respected industry leaders gave them public recognition and served as an industry education tool.
In 1996-97, King County took a leadership role in testing job-site recycling at the state’s largest construction project, a criminal justice center including a courthouse, jail, and administrative offices. Able for the first time to require large-scale job-site recycling through a construction contract, the county encountered and overcame many of the barriers that contractors perceived about recycling.
An education campaign needed to be created that reached a broad spectrum of construction company owners, project managers, job-site supervisors, and labor crews from different trades.
Construction recycling is promoted through several avenues. All local licensed contractors receive quarterly mailings, in which particular companies’ job-site successes are recognized and technical assistance information is provided. The radio and print advertising the county purchases also recognizes Construction Works members (a membership benefit). The Construction Works program also displays at booths set up at public fairs and shows.
SEEKING PARTNERSHIPS
To strengthen its programs, the county sought to involve well respected construction firms and construction trade associations. Conducting case studies helped to develop relationships with the prominent construction firms that were profiled—firms who were also active in the local trade association for general contractors.
By leveraging those relationships, access was gained to the trade association, an important step in expanding an audience and garnering industry endorsement for recycling and for "green building" in general.
The program was up against a common belief that job site recycling would raise labor costs because it requires separating and sorting material into containers. By disseminating the case study results through the trade organizations, we showed that recycling cost savings offset the rare, negligible bump in labor costs. The major trade groups have subsequently established policies supporting construction site recycling.
The author is the manager of the King County Green Building Program. The county’s program provides assistance to public and private sector developers and builders on green building issues.
Explore the February 2002 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Recycling Today
- Nucor receives West Virginia funding assist
- Ferrous market ends 2024 in familiar rut
- Aqua Metals secures $1.5M loan, reports operational strides
- AF&PA urges veto of NY bill
- Aluminum Association includes recycling among 2025 policy priorities
- AISI applauds waterways spending bill
- Lux Research questions hydrogen’s transportation role
- Sonoco selling thermoformed, flexible packaging business to Toppan for $1.8B