CALIFORNIA EYES CCA-TREATED WOOD
The state of California has introduced a bill that addresses the handling of wood treated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA).
According to Construction Materials Recycling Association (CMRA) Executive Director William Turley, California Assembly Bill 1367 is legislation to reauthorize a waiver process whereby the state’s Department of Toxics can grant waivers for certain types of low-level hazardous waste, such as pressure-treated wood, to be disposed of in Class 3 lined waste dumps rather than Class 1 hazardous waste facilities.
The department long had the ability to grant such waivers (and did so), but when its authority to do so ran out last year, it needed to be renewed. But the bill has been amended to limit applicability to waivers of household hazardous waste only, according to Turley.
Hence, he says, if passed, no waiver is possible and pressure treated/chemically-treated wood will have to be separated from all scrap wood and handled like hazardous waste by contractors and recyclers. It also will require that this type of wood be dumped only at Class 1 facilities, of which there are only three in the state, all in Southern California, says Turley.
It costs on average $300 per ton to dump at Class 1 facilities, compared to $40 per ton at Class 3 facilities, according to the CMRA. This figure doesn’t include the extra hauling costs.
VEIT COS. HONORED FOR SAFETY
Veit Cos., Minneapolis, has received two awards for safety, including its second consecutive Governor’s Safety Award from the Minnesota Safety Council.
The construction, demolition, excavating and recycling firm, which is a member of the Construction Materials Recycling Association, also received the Commander’s Safety & Occupational Health Award from the Omaha Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Veit Cos. received that award for its safe handling of the closure and demolition of 14 U.S. Army missile launch control facilities in North Dakota.
"Veit Cos. achieved an exemplary safety record because of its project health and safety plans," wrote U.S. Army Colonel Kurt Ubbelohde in notifying Veit Cos. of its award.
CALIFORNIA C&D LANDFILLS ASK FOR FALSE RECYCLING FRONT |
The California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), Sacramento, is reportedly developing new regulations for inert landfills that recyclers say will allow the landfills to put on a false recycling front. C&D recycling advocates such as Stephen Bantillo, chair of the Construction & Demolition Council of the California Resource Recovery Association (CRRA) and board member of the Construction Materials Recycling Association (CMRA), says the waste industry is lobbying heavily to drop the words "disposed," "disposal" and "waste" from the definitions and other relevant sections of the proposed regulations for inert materials. The logic of the argument rests on using C&D debris to fill existing dumps, with the goal of selling the filled-in land for redevelopment. By categorizing this as recycling not dumping, the landfill owners and generators of the material will not have to pay host fees and will be able to count the material toward state-mandated recycling goals. Legitimate concrete recyclers in the area could be hurt because the dump sites could then compete for material that offers a recycling incentive, thus steering material away from their crushing and screening facilities. In a letter to the CIWMB, Bantillo writes: "The disposal industry representatives want us to believe that keeping the ‘dispose’ words in the Proposed Regulations may cause them financial hardships in Southern California due to fees that may apply to disposed materials and materials hauled out of town from transfer facilities. To be clear, this regulatory package is about disposal facilities and the activities that occur there, hence the title of Article 5.95, ‘Construction and Demolition Waste and Inert Debris Disposal Regulatory Requirements.’ If the final resting place of materials is a disposal facility and not the ‘economic mainstream’ as defined in Section 17388, Definitions, sub(s) of the Proposed Regulations, then should the materials be deemed disposed [of] and not count as recycling? "The Legislature took a swing at this issue with AB 2308 and came up short. But, the bill did provide an opportunity for the CIWMB to set the record straight, which is the request of the Construction & Demolition Council. "Please keep the words ‘disposed,’ ‘disposal’ and ‘waste’ in the Proposed Regulations so as not to remove viable materials from the economic mainstream and put recyclers at a greater competitive disadvantage." |
The colonel noted that Veit employees, "worked in excess of 91,000 man-hours without any type of reportable or lost time accidents—a significant accomplishment."
NADC SAFTEY SUMMIT APPROACHES
The Westin Los Angeles Airport hotel will host this fall’s National Association of Demolition Contractors (NADC) Safety Summit.
The ninth annual version of the Safety Summit will take place Oct. 23-24.
Speakers from several safety segments will offer presentations (and some demonstrations) on personal protection equipment; electrical safety; fall protection and rigging; fireproof clothing; toxic mold; and safety training for Spanish-speaking workers.
Those interested in the event can contact the NADC at its Doylestown, Pa., headquarters at (800) 541-2412.
HEAT IS ON LAS VEGAS C&D RECYCLERS
Three handlers of C&D debris in the Las Vegas area are being sued in federal court by Republic Silver State Disposal, which is the franchised hauler for much of Clark County, Nev.
The lawsuit claims that Nevada Construction Clean Up and Lunas Construction are operating two illegal dumps in Clark County, as is Western Elite, which is also charged with an illegal landfill in Lincoln County.
The Las Vegas Review-Journal has reported that the lawsuit claims the defendants fraudulently posed as legitimate haulers of construction and demolition waste and as recyclers.
The document claims Nevada Construction and Lunas "provide virtually no recycling" and that the waste they haul is "not properly disposed of under federal, state and local law."
Under franchising restrictions, Republic is the only company allowed to collect and dispose of C&D materials generated in the area, although local ordinances do allow a commercial recycler to transport recyclable material.
What is recyclable is defined under regulations approved by the Clark County Board of Health late last year (see "Mixed C&D Markets Pinched in Vegas," C&D Recycler, pg. 6, Jan./Feb. 2003). Those regulations identify source-separated loads as recyclable, but label mixed debris as waste that must go to Republic’s landfill. Critics contend the regulations were developed by a committee made up of board members and representatives of Republic, with input from no other haulers or recyclers.
Republic’s lawsuit claims the defendants were engaged in a racketeering activity and also accuses them of interfering with franchise agreements between Republic and Clark County, Las Vegas, North Las Vegas and Henderson. The suit seeks unspecified damages and seeks an injunction to stop the defendants from accepting any more mixed material at their sites. It also asks the defendants to clean up their sites.
The Review-Journal quotes Norberto Madrigal, part owner of Lunas Construction, saying he disagrees with the allegations in the suit. "They want to shut us down because they’re not getting money from the materials that we’re recycling," Madrigal tells the paper.
Other recyclers in the area not named in the suit say that despite Republic having the current regulations written in their favor for more than six months, the company has laid low until now that the state legislature is out of session for at least a year. (The Nevada legislature meets every two years.)
With the lack of sessions in Carson City depriving critics of podium time, Republic has started up surveillance on recyclers to monitor their activities and report any perceived violations.
Explore the October 2003 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Recycling Today
- Alumetal of Poland issues EPD
- Bolder Industries receives grant for European project
- Regenx says US facility back online
- Cliffs has money-losing Q3
- BIR Autumn 2024: Supply challenges poised to grow
- Befesa reports double-digit adjusted EBITDA growth in Q3
- Companies partner to standardize build of chemical recycling plants
- Solarcycle to add recycling plant to Georgia campus